• Private certifier gets nailed – depaNews November 2010
  • Wake up and don't worry - depaNews February 2011
  • HR professionals – depaNews January 2009
  • Upper Hunter gets coy – depaNews March 2011
  • BPB kills off B1 & B2 - depaNews July 2009
  • Councillors behaving badly Part One - depaNews December 2009
  • Councillors behaving badly Part Two - depaNews December 2009
  • Who is Peter Hurst? - depaNews August 2010
  • It's time to go, Peter Part One - depaNews September 2006
  • It's time to go Peter Part Two - depaNews December 2006
  • BPB survey on accreditation – depaNews November 2008
  • Improbable things start to come true – depaNews June 2010
  • Sex, lies and development – depaNews February 2008
  • Pizza man feeds non-members – depaNews April 2011
  • Bankstown wins HR Award – depaNews December 2010
  • Love him or loathe him - depaNews October 2007
  • Good Bad & Ugly issue – depaNews November 2010
  • Upper Hunter lets the dogs out - depaNews February 2011
  • IRC puts brakes on belligerent seven – depaNews June 2009
  • It's Tweedledum and not Tweedledumber - depaNews March 2007
  • 28 April International Day of Mourning - depaNews April 2009
  • IRC orders Hurst 'apology' published - depaNews December 2010
  • Debate on IR policy – depaNews August 2007
  • Developer agrees to apologise – depaNews November 2010
  • OH&S Day of Mourning – depaNews April 2009

The Development and Environmental Professionals' Association (depa)

Welcome to the depa website. We are an industrial organisation representing professional employees working in local government in New South Wales in a variety of jobs in the fields of environmental health, public health, building and development control and planning.

We take a broad approach to our responsibilities to members and give advice and assistance on professional issues as well as industrial and workplace issues. We understand what members do at work and that allows us to take a holistic approach. Read more about us...

This site will keep you up-to-date with union news and the diverse range of workplace advocacy issues we deal with daily. We have made it easy for members to contact us with online forms. Join depa online now

What's a Consultative Committee and what does it do?

In the 1980s, when there was a co-operative relationship between the Hawke/Keating Federal government and the trade union movement, principles were adopted by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission and the various State Commissions to improve the structural efficiency of industries.

Part of this process was the adoption of the wisdom of having a formalised consultation process in industrial instruments to require employers to consult with employees and to allow employees to provide valuable feedback to management about workplace initiatives and how the work is done.

The provision to require the establishment of Consultative Committees at each council was first incorporated in the State Award in 1992. With almost 20 years of hindsight, it's clear it hasn't been easy but there still remains a valuable role for a genuine consultative process.

This doesn't mean Management wheeling in initiatives with an expectation that they will be automatically rubber stamped by the employee representatives, nor does it mean councils proposing initiatives at the Consultative Committee and, even faced with unanimous opposition by employee representatives, continuing with that initiative.

The process is meant to be genuinely consultative and management is intended to be open-minded to this approach.

It is true that consultative committees have exhausted many, many volunteers who went into a process with open-minds and great enthusiasm to be met by tedium, management regarding the exercise as a waste of time, preoccupations with trivia etc. However, Consultative Committees continue to perform a valuable role.

Clause 28 Consultative Committees prescribes the aim, size and composition, scope (that is, the functions) and requirements about meetings and support services.

Significantly, clause 28C(i) provides the following as the minimum functions of the Committees:

  1. Award implementation
  2. training
  3. consultation with regard to organisation restructure
  4. job redesign
  5. salary systems
  6. communication and education mechanisms
  7. performance management systems
  8. changes to variable working hours arrangements for new or vacant positions
  9. local government reform
  10. proposed variations the least practical arrangements

The size and composition of the Consultative Committees (clause 28B) is to be agreed "by Council and the local representatives" from the three unions but there is a minimum requirement of representatives of the three unions which have members at the Council.

While this allows an opportunity for councils to try to reach agreement to have representatives of non-union members, these initiatives are invariably rejected by the local union representatives and this opposition is encouraged by the three unions.

Robbo's Pearls...

What’s happening to the senior staff changes?

On 15 October 2021 the LGNSW Board, spurred on by a second recommendation from another ICAC investigation (Operation Dasha) to get rid of the “no reason” sacking of senior staff, unanimously resolved to do precisely that. LGNSW would now support the views we and the other unions have been expressing for decades. This was a historic consensus.

The consensus was to amend section 340 of the Local Government Act 1993 to ensure that the only Senior Staff positions, on term contracts and denied access to the industrial relations commission would be the general manager. And to amend the Industrial Relations Act to lift the remuneration level for access on unfair dismissals.

All we needed was the OLG and the Government to cooperate. That was close enough to two and a half years ago. 

There was some venal opposition from the usual suspects, but the policy was overwhelmingly reaffirmed at the LGNSW Special Conference on 1 March 2022. That was close enough to two years ago.

In April 2023 a Labor Government was elected in NSW. We all had a reasonable expectation they’d be more supportive of employment changes that reduced the risk of corruption and provided fairer working conditions. They say they are.

What have you blokes been doing?

Hoenig and Minns

Copyright © 2025 The Development and Environmental Professionals' Association (depa). All Rights Reserved. Webdesign: Dot Online