Government announces Roger Rogerson as a role model as Australians encouraged to work into their 70s

Treasurer Joe Hockey has been talking up the “inevitability” of an increase in the retirement age all year. The Government in the recent budget endorsed proposals that will see Australians working until the age of 70 before there are eligible for the age pension.

Prior to the election the Treasurer said people should “work as long as they can” and ridiculed responses that there were many jobs were so physically demanding and debilitating that this would be impossible.

"The Government’s appointment of Rogerson as a role model for ageing Australians illustrates that no one should be written off at the age of 73. Roger is an inspiration to many of us”, Treasurer Hockey said. “An active life, never hurt anyone”.

Winking distractedly, the PM observed it was a bit like fighting fires. Sometimes you had to smash a door down.

Subcategories

depaNEWS

 

14 March 2013    Issue 50 {readonline}Click here to view it online{/readonline}
depaNews logo

 

GM and Mayor tell everyone to get Farooqed

Liverpool GM Farooq Portelli and Mayor Ned Mannoun

It’s official: Liverpool Council treats everyone with contempt.

Contempt for their existing managers, contempt for their duties and obligations under the Local Government (State) Award, contempt for the unions asking for “all relevant information” and contempt for the processes of the Industrial Relations Commission.

LCC isn’t Liverpool City Council, it’s Liverpool Contemptuous Council.

This morning was the sixth occasion that the USU’s dispute about the restructure (joined enthusiastically by depa and the LGEA) was dealt with by the IRC and those six occasions were punctuated by a meeting of the parties in the offices of the LGSA. Fruitless, of course, someone wasn’t listening.

Clause 35 of the State Award creates significant duties and obligations for a Council in a restructure. People affected need to be told, as do the unions to which they belong, the parties are to meet as soon as possible, Council is obliged to provide “all relevant information” and the Council is even obliged to think about reconsidering.

The questions the unions were asking remain unanswered. The Council has not provided information like the individual salary ranges of the existing 23 manager positions, how many manager positions are merged to create the eight Group Managers and therefore it’s impossible to judge whether the “bigger jobs” created in the restructure are paid the same, more, or even less than the original positions. That sounds like relevant information.

And at no stage has the Council been prepared to say why it is critical to their vision for the future that the eight Group Managers, the third level of management in the organisation, need to be Senior Staff under the Local Government Act and, as a result of that, employed on term contracts.

It’s constantly being reinforced in the industry that the inadequate and inflexible Standard Contract for Senior Staff allows employees to be sacked without reason being given. A power misused by the Council at Camden late last year and last night, at Auburn. Two general managers doing the right thing and terminated under the terms of the contract without reason. The latest in a long tradition.

(And don’t, as an aside, expect that the Division of Local Government is going to do anything about it. They prefer to be spectators watching the infamy unfold at Camden and Auburn than actually doing something to prevent it. It’s beyond their own self-imposed restrictions.)

It seems a relatively simple question to ask “why?" the Council would exercise their discretion under section 332 of the Local Government Act to determine, in a decision unprecedented in the two decades since 1993 Act was made, to make the third level of management Senior Staff. After all, there are more and better opportunities for flexibility in remuneration and reward for performance, under the Award than the unimaginative and restrictive Standard Contract.

The DLG hates flexibility on remuneration because they think it’s “open slather” - based on an expectation that elected councillors regularly shower general managers and senior staff with largess and riches beyond their wildest dreams: an expectation which underpins their reactionary role but which would elicit only derision and laughter were they game to announce it to the industry.

But Liverpool refuses to say why. Given the opportunity on six occasions in the Commission, they only wanted to say they could, or the jobs were strategic, or something else which carefully avoided dealing with the complications which arise from making positions term contracts and removing the protections and safety of permanent on-going employment.

And GM Portelli insisted “I do not believe that employment under a term contract exposes people to a disadvantage”. Uh oh, there is increasing number of general managers in the industry who would happily tell him otherwise.

But while the GM may not have been game to disclose their real motivation in the Commission, Mayor Ned Mannoun was quite happy to do so - boasting what a progressive Council they were with their current restructure, but they’d been taken by the nasty unions to the Commission, at a Urban Taskforce Forum conducted in conjunction with the Daily Telegraph. Gee, developers and the Murdoch press - how could you lie down with that lot and get out without fleas?

But Councillor Mannoun, manning up to the job of seducing the developers (who he described as “the engine room of our economy”) answered the question “why?”

Because “it takes us a year to performance manage a staff member out of the workforce”.

First of all, this is factually incorrect. The Council is extremely good at performance managing people out of the workforce and, if there were an award across the industry for this process, the Manager of Ejection from the Workforce and Liverpool would win it.

But more importantly, doesn’t that just say it all?

It was precisely what the unions suspected. Term contracts allow good employees to be treated unfairly by not being offered a renewal, or by termination under the “for any other reason” provision with the payment of 38 weeks pay. And they allow an employer off the hook on any obligation to properly manage the performance of someone who isn’t up to scratch. And that’s neither responsible stewardship of public money, nor good public policy.

So we wrote to the Mayor congratulating him on being prepared to be so open and honest about the motivation underpinning the restructure and the placing of the third level of management on term contracts when representatives from the Council in the Commission were not quite so game. We invited him to come to the Commission on the next occasion, and tell the Commission that as well.

The Mayor said no.

So, if Farooq wants all of his strategic managers capable of being removed without notice, he’s got it. If he wants his entire Executive Team removable without proper process, capriciously or unfairly, he’s got that too. After all, if it’s good enough for him, it’s good enough for everyone. Or realistically, if it’s bad enough for him, it’s bad enough for them too. Funny thing to do with public money, though.

So, be warned. These Group Manager jobs are likely to be advertised on the weekend and only the overly self-confident, the deluded, and the risk takers need apply. For anyone suicidal and attracted to the scenario of creating a fuss and inviting the police to shoot them, this is the job for you.

Unfortunately in the Commission this morning Justice Staff refused to make two directions sought by depa and supported by the USU and the LGEA. He refused to direct that the Council provide comparisons of the existing rates for managers alongside the proposed new rates, so we could tell whether people can be paid fairly for these new and bigger jobs, and he refused to direct the attendance of the Mayor on the next occasion we fought this out to say what he is apparently only prepared to say while flattering and sucking up to developers.

Liverpool wants to get rid of people without fair process. The Council’s own external consultant found that the overwhelming emotion amongst the workforce was fear and now the Council can extend that emotion right through their Executive Team.

 
info icon

IN THIS ISSUE

{tableofcontents|type:h2}
 
info icon

QUICK LINKS

Frequently asked questions
Online forms
Update your details online
 
info icon

CONTACT US

Email us

Phone (02) 9712 5255

In other news, there is no worse news

But we do await the Draft Planning legislation, something from the IPART Review and the latest in the failure of the DLG to do something constructive to harness Auburn sackers.

But there is good news. North Sydney triumphed at the depa Union Picnic Day Golf Day last Friday at Blackheath and, conversely, the Hills didn’t - picking up the Bradman for the highest score.

Congratulations to Brett Maina, Joseph Hill, Peter Williams and Warwick Wynn from North Sydney and when we have an official presentation of the coveted depa Cup we’ll put a picture in depaNews.

As for the Hills, we’re not sure if the GM will put on a lunch for a presentation. We all admire sporting achievement. We love the Australian (Women’s) Cricket Team, Usain Bolt making it look easy, Tiger at his peak, Heather Mackay (look it up) and the Queensland Rugby League team whether we support them or not. As sporting achievements these people and teams are beyond compare.

None of this applies to the Hills, of course, but because sport is all about how you play rather than whether you win or lose, we congratulate them and look forward to the presentation. (Come on, Dave.)  


Ian Robertson signature

Ian Robertson
Secretary


www.depa.au
 
You have received this email because you are a current depa member.
Make sure you always get our emails, add  to your address book

 

Robbo's pearls...

Ian Robertson depa Secretary muses about life the universe and everything.

It’s in the Minister’s office but nothing’s happening. It has been:

since the Government and the Minister were appointed on 5 April 2023. We are still waiting for the legislative changes required.

Copyright © 2024 The Development and Environmental Professionals' Association (depa). All Rights Reserved. Webdesign: Dot Online